• 2 weeks ago

## February 25, 2021

### Closed Loop Espresso Intro

Even before getting a lever espresso machine, I've been thinking about how I might design one if I were to do it from scratch.

This is the layout I've converged to:

The basic summary is:
- Electric motor driven pump pumps water through a heater.
- If the water at the output of the heater isn't up to temperature, the 3-way valve after the heater will cycle the water back through the tank.
- Once the water at the output of the heater is up to temperature, the valve switches and water is piped over to the group head and coffee.
- An extra "drain" valve between the group head and the drip tray relieves pressure after the shot is done.  Strictly this isn't necessary, but it serves a few purposes I'll get into later.

Critically with this setup, the whole tank of water doesn't have to get hot as it would in a boiler-based espresso machine.  I'm hoping to get the delay between powering the machine on and pulling the first shot down to a minute or less.  With a standard 15A mains outlet, it should be possible to real-time heat over 5 mL/s of water from room-temperature to espresso temperature, so main delay is in getting the thermal mass of the heater up to temperature.

The pump:

As far as I can tell, most "real" espresso machines use either vibratory pumps or rotary vane pumps.  From a pure performance perspective these don't seem like great solutions to me.  Vibratory pumps are noisy and hard to control (not saying you can't, Decent does pressure control with vibratory pump), and their main appeal is they're cheap and you can plug them straight into mains.  Rotary vane pumps are positive displacement (which is good for pressure control, roughly speaking), but tend to have large displacements - meaning for a given pressure, a lot of torque is needed at the input, since (ignoring losses) $$energy = torque*angle = pressure*displacement$$.  Lots of torque = large motor or gear reduction.  However, the pumping power requirements for making espresso are tiny - on the order of a few watts of $$pressure*flow rate$$ (9 Bar * 4 mL/s is 3.6 watts, and I think that's towards the upper end of espresso flow rates).  So a pump with a small displacement and a tiny motor (effectively getting "gear reduction" through the pump) makes more sense to me.

Gear pumps were my first though.  What I wanted was "stainless steel body gear pump with PEEK gears", and it turns out that exactly this object exists and can be purchased on ebay for a few tens of dollars.  Even better, they all are magnetically coupled, so there are no shaft seals to leak.  A couple weeks later I had a Fluid-o-Tech MG304 pump.

Here's a shot of the inside.  The gears and bushings are CF-PEEK and the rest is stainless:

Here's a relevant plot from the datasheet.  The blue curve labeled "A" is for a 1 cP viscosity fluid, e.g. water.    Should be able to get over 200 psi at greater-than-espresso flow rates.  Since the pump displacement is so small, torques needed are in the ~.1 N-m or less range, which means I can use a tiny motor.

The main downside of gear pumps is leakage - which you can see in the pressure vs flow plot.  Gear pumps "seal" by having very close tolerances between the tooth tips and faces of the gears and the pump cavity, so some fluid leaks through these gaps.  For this pump it's very linear with pressure - at a constant input speed (which would be a constant flow if there were no leakage), output flow drops off linearly with pressure drop across the pump.

The pump came with a low-end brushed maxon driving it.  I swapped that for a Moog BN23 Silencer motor I snagged from a Media Lab trash pile ~7 years ago.  One of its larger brethren was used to power the tiny lathe, and another by Dane for Robot Art.  A 3d-printed spacer adapts it to the pump.  Eventually this'll need to be replaced with a more temperature resistant part, since the water flowing through the pump will get fairly warm.

I modified a spare pendulum motor controller so I could plug in the pressure sensor.  Eventually I'll  have a separate micro for doing all the high-level control and use one of my usual motor drives with the built in encoder, but for now this was the easiest thing to hack together.

This was my pressure control test bed -  the pump and motor, an automotive-style thread-in pressure sensor, a dial pressure gauge, and a needle valve as a variable load;

Testing closed-loop pressure control.  The pressure is plotted/setpoint set from the computer, and you can see the response to the needle valve opening and closing.  With this setup I can get around 10 Hz of closed-loop pressure bandwidth.

Some kind of interesting notes about the pressure control, looping back to the pressure relief valve.  One of the factors limiting the pressure control bandwidth is the compliance in the pump system.  A lot of this is from the magnetic coupling, which has a sinusoidal force-vs-displacement profile, with zero stiffness around zero displacement, and relatively low peak stiffness.  The other source of compliance is the fluid circuit - the bulk modulus of the fluid, the stiffness of the tubing and other stuff between the pump and the output, and much more importantly, the volume of air trapped in the system.  Without the relief valve, a big air bubble could get trapped in the top of the group head, above the puck of coffee, which would add a huge compliance.  To avoid this, the relief valve can be kept open until the group head is full of water, and then closed.

On to water heating:

The water heater is made from three 1/4" x 7" die heaters sandwiched between two thin aluminum plates, with a stainless tube snaking between the heaters.  My main goal was minimizing the thermal mass of the heater.  This design is kind of terrible, but it's functional enough to get me going.  The bend radius is super tight, and I did a few test bends that went well, but most of the bends in the final heater are awful.   Still, they didn't crack and still pass water, so good enough.

Two thick sheets of FR4 sandwich the whole assembly for insulation.  The machinist clamps are for extra pressure in the center.  Yeah, this design was bad.

For water temperature control, I have a platinum RTD in the flow of water, and a thermistor measuring the temperature of the heater.  I circulate water through the heating loop and back into the tank (in the picture above the metal pot...) until the the water temperature sensor has converged to the desired temperature, and then a 3-way valve is switch to pipe the hot water to the group head instead of back to the tank.  It takes around a minute to converge from room temperature to ~90C, and that's with a pretty terribly designed heater and a water temperature sensor with way too much thermal mass (I used a generic NPT threaded sensor so I could throw this together quickly).  So I think with some actual design I'll be able to get it even faster.

Similar to the heater, the group head was designed to be low thermal mass.  This is the opposite of how most espresso machines work, where the groups often have as much thermal mass as possible for "thermal stability"  But they're usually heated by water or steam from the boiler.  With the power of feedback control, low thermal mass, a group heater, and a group temperature sensor seems like the way to go.

I designed the group to work with a La Pavoni  portafilter, shower screen, and group seal, since I already had those lying around.  For the final version of all this (assuming there is a final version), I'll probably switch over to the standard 58mm portafilter size.

Here's the CAD and a cross section.  The typical wall thickness is 1.5-2mm.  I could definitely have gone harder with the light-weighting, but I wasn't in the mood for any analysis (this is pressurized to ~150 psi), so I just eyeballed it for now.  Next round of parts I'll probably be able to make it ~50% lighter.

A screenshot of the CAM for making the top half of the group.  Thanks to the power of the 5-axis mill, it was only 2 setups, despite the holes pointed in every direction.

Video of the machining:

The finished parts assembled with seal and shower screen;

With the group head done, all it took was an afternoon of plumbing, sketchy wiring, and a tiny bit of firmware to read a few new temperature sensors and toggle valves.

Everything's just bolted to a strip of aluminum right now, and I stole the drip tray from the La Pavoni.

Here's the first test of the machine.  In my excitement I let it run for a little too long and the shot ended up over-extracted, but it turned out way better than I expected for a first try.  Pardon the wrench used as a handle for the group head - McMaster order with with a threaded handle was delayed.

For this test the group head wasn't heated, but I do have a 100W cartridge heater and thermistor for it, so the water flowing through it won't be cooled down.

While right now the machine is a huge heap on a benchtop, I think with some actual design it could be packaged to be very compact.

1. What an amazing project!! Congrats!

2. This is awesome! I look forward to seeing the compact version. The convenience of not waiting for boilers is huge.

3. Very nice project. I've been thinking about something similar, I just don't have the necessary equipment. All espresso machines with pressure profiling cost over € 3k. For example, Decent or new VBM ...
I don't mind investing time and still have fun.

4. As someone who also has an old Pavoni Pro and goals of making a DIY espresso machine, this is awesome to see. Good luck on the project, that machine grouphead is gorgeous and I'd love to see a 58mm style one.

5. This is really amazing, I am deeply in love with this machine. I wish that such things would be open source and this is actually something like it :)

6. Hi,What CAD and CNC machine are you using?

1. I use Solidworks.

CNC Mill details:
https://build-its-inprogress.blogspot.com/2020/10/benchtop-5-axis-mill.html?m=1

https://www.xslightings.com/pocket-nc/desktop-5-axis-milling-machine.html

7. Hi,
Nice work! I was wondering wich kind of SSR have you used to drive the heater as seen in your video. I'm pimping my old Breville Ikon espresso machine adding a better controlled temperature and it would be a nice to have to drive the heating well.

1. I used this one:
https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/te-connectivity-potter-brumfield-relays/SSR-240D25/678179

I'll eventually design some more compact electronics for this, but for now I'm using a panel mount ssr for convenience.

8. Cool project! I've thought about hacking together an espresso machine using a group head from a donor machine, but never even dreamed of milling my own. Thanks for sharing!

9. Love this! I’ve been thinking about gear pump and scale closed loop for my GS3, but couldn’t find a good gear pump, but looks like you found a good candidate. I’m very inspired to build mine now!

10. Very nice, well done!
Which algorithm did you use for the PIDs control loops?

11. I absolutely love this project! I've been itching to try something similar. Would you be willing to share any of the 3D files? Especially for the group head?

1. I will at some point organize things and put firmware + simulations + cad on git. stay tuned.

12. What did you machine the group head out of? Brass?

1. It's actually Aluminum Bronze, just because I had a scrap log of it.

13. Hi Ben, interested in buying a completed article/collaborating on building (mechanical fabrication) a contained system with software (UI and control, monitoring)

1. Hi,
It's going to be a while before I have a "complete" machine done in a nice form factor, but feel free to reach out through the comment page to discuss collaboration, etc.

14. Hi Ben,
Interesting project, I've similar thoughts of building an espresso machine, however, still in the designing phase. A question for you, have you thought to use a screw pump? it's much smoother than gear pumps and have the capability to handle high RPM.

Thanks for sharing!

1. Ripple isn't too bad with this pump - for example, at 6 bars I'm getting around .04 bar pressure ripple amplitude.

Do you know of any specific screw pump models that are as compact as the gear pump I'm using?

15. Hi Ben again,
What is your thought of using compressed air in controlling the system pressure? it's been boggling in my head for a while, it has several benefits in terms of pressure stability and temperature fluctuation. You may argue me about the feasibility and the form factor of such machine, but that can be improved feature if air-pressure system will bring significant improvement in controlling the shot.

Your thoughts going to be great :)

1. A couple challenges I can think of:

- Air is very compliant at these pressures, which will probably make achieving good pressure control bandwidth hard. The way to get the best bandwidth with pneumatics would probably be to use a pump + air tank + pneumatic servovalve, which adds a lot of pieces compared to just a hydraulic pump.

- If the air is displacing water during the shot, the total air volume will be changing throughout the shot - so the stiffness of the air might change dramatically throughout the shot. Could be an annoying control issue. This wouldn't be much of an issue if you essentially pressurized a "boiler" sort of like a conventional espresso machine (but pressurized by a pneumatic pump instead of steam), but that requires a large volume of air which will make the pressure bandwidth very slow.

- I don't see how using air for pressure rather than a hydraulic pump affects temperature.

At the end of the day, air is a spring/damper, so it will low-pass filter the pressure. If the goal is to smooth out pressure ripple, this could be done more simply by getting/building a smoother pump, or by adding some mechanical compliance (similar to a hydraulic accumulator) in parallel with the group. But I don't see pressure ripple as an issue with the setup I have now.

16. Any news?